Incorporated in Trenton, New Jersey35 services · 3 practices · 8 industries
Government & Public Sector · Confidential client

FedRAMP Moderate with ServiceNow Continuous Monitoring for a Grants Platform

An agency authorization, and monthly continuous monitoring packages that take two days to assemble instead of two weeks.

Client name withheld by agreement
Client
Grants management software provider to federal and state agencies
Region
Rockville, Maryland
Year
2024
Duration
36 weeks
Scope
Moderate baseline · 323 controls · POA&M and ConMon in ServiceNow
Practice
AI, Cloud & Digital Trust

The challenge

What was at stake.

A grants management software provider served state agencies and wanted to sell to a federal department that funds research grants. That required a FedRAMP Moderate authorization, and the sponsoring agency wanted to see a credible continuous monitoring process before it would commit.

The company tracked vulnerabilities in a spreadsheet, changes in Jira and incidents in ServiceNow. Every monthly continuous monitoring deliverable would have meant reconciling all three by hand, for as long as it held the authorization.

What we did

The approach, step by step.

  1. 01

    Authorization boundary designed

    We defined a dedicated boundary in a government cloud region, with its own identity provider, logging, scanning and deployment pipeline, separate from the commercial product.

  2. 02

    Controls implemented with the engineers

    FIPS-validated encryption, configuration baselines, centralized audit logging and authenticated scanning were engineered in, and each of the 323 control narratives was written with the person who runs it.

  3. 03

    POA&M managed in ServiceNow

    Scanner findings flow into ServiceNow Vulnerability Response, deviation requests are approved in workflow, and the POA&M is generated from those records in the FedRAMP template.

  4. 04

    Significant change built into change control

    ServiceNow change records now ask whether a change touches the boundary, and anything that could be a significant change goes to the security lead before approval.

  5. 05

    Assessment supported to authorization

    We prepared evidence for the 3PAO, tracked findings to closure and supported the agency’s review through to its authorization decision.

Outcomes

What changed, in numbers.

323
controls implemented and documented
2 days
to assemble the monthly ConMon package
0
high findings at the 3PAO assessment
10
months from kickoff to agency authorization
The agency asked to see our continuous monitoring before they signed. We showed them ServiceNow, and the conversation was over in an hour.
Chief Operating Officer, client name withheld
Facing something similar?

Let’s talk about your version of this.

Share what you are up against. A senior practitioner who has delivered this kind of work will reply within one business day.